In 2004, there were no smartphones, no Twitter, and not even YouTube. However, that seems a bit harder to believe today. In a 2004 interview, Rowling was asked, “Are the Muggle and Magical worlds ever going to be rejoined?” And her response was, “No, the breach was final, although as book six shows, the Muggles are noticing more and more odd happenings now that Voldemort’s back.” This suggests that muggles will never be able to expose wizards. The one point I’m aware of that Rowling definitely did say (though even then only by implication) is that wizards will always beat muggles in secrecy. TL DR: The muggles would win, unless the wizards maintain the element of surprise, but most individual wizards who want to escape the muggles will be able to.įirst off, we should consider whether the author has anything to say about this debate, but in fact J. Also, when I did that, I was quickly alerted to the fact that I should also be checking r/whowouldwin, so I read through those debates, too.Īnd the answer, it turns out, is that it’s complicated. I looked at the top hits for this debate on r/harrypotter and r/HPfanfiction, but I found r/HPfanfiction to be generally better for substantive debate. wizards” threads that have been made over the years, I could get a pretty comprehensive view of the arguments that are being made and what factors people are considering. I thought that if I looked at some of the “muggles vs. To do this, I turned to Reddit, where weird scenarios like this get debated frequently. Rather than trying to solve the whole problem from the beginning, let’s go through the different advantages and disadvantages each side has to try to building up a winning strategy they could use. However, I never forgot about it, and over the past year, I’ve thought of a different way to go about it. I thought about it for a while at the time, but I eventually dropped it because I thought it was too complicated, and the more I thought about it, the less sure I was of the answer. I teased this essay all the way back in 2018 when I reviewed The Crimes of Grindelwald. With the release of Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore this week, I though I would answer the age-old question in the Harry Potter universe: who would win in a fight between the wizards and the muggles? Seeing a major war occurring in Europe has changed our perspective collectively on some of these things, but it doesn’t really change my conclusions in this essay. What’s fun is playing by the rules, and this wizard needs to start doing that, STAT.Note: I wrote the vast majority of this essay before the current war in Ukraine. Not saying we’re experts on this stuff, but it seems pretty obvious that wizards shouldn’t be allowed to have guns. Here’s hoping he comes to his senses and gets rid of the gun, or, if not that, the police come and take him to jail. So where does he think he gets off? Again, this must be in violation of some warlock oath. So not sure where this guy got the idea that it’s okay for him to have one. And, if you factor in the likelihood that the wizard could very easily put a spell on the bullets and supercharge them so that they can travel for hundreds of miles or turn into bombs or something, there’s really no limit on the destruction he’s capable of.īesides, none of the famous wizards from popular culture that we know and love have ever had a gun. But this wizard has a gun AND a wand, giving him a huge edge over not only regular people but also his fellow sorcerers. It’d be a bit quirky for sure, but ultimately not a big deal. Now, it’d be one thing if the wizard was just going to use his pistol as a wand to shoot spells. Even if it’s legal, it absolutely shouldn’t be. Plus, they basically already have control over life and death, so the fact that this wizard is just out and about holding both a wand and a pistol is beyond unfair, as no guy should have that much power. To begin with, wizards already have a major advantage over regular people because their knowledge of spells and other forms of devilry allows them to do pretty much whatever they want all the time-and certainly having a gun tips the scales even more in their favor. Never do guns factor into archetypical depictions of wizards, presumably because it’d look weird and unnatural for them to pack heat, as is clearly evidenced by this magical oddball here, whose gun-toting demeanor feels so jarring and wrong that you’d assume it must be in violation of some unspoken rule or warlock oath. For several hours now, the wizard has been waving his gun around and making “ pew pew pew! ” sounds, brazenly defying society’s widely agreed-upon understanding of wizards as spooky, bearded grandpas armed only with small wooden wands that are used for shooting magic spells and turning various objects into frogs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |